Thursday, 22 September 2011
Satellite apocalypse
No, I don't mean Big Brother Australia will be shown on Sky. I mean this:
We're doomed. Doomed, I tell you, dooooo...
... oh, just the size of a bus and weighing about six tonnes? And that's giant now, is it? I mean, I kind of assumed that giant meant, you know, giant. Biggest thing to have hit the planet since Tunguska, sort of thing. At the very least all the flapping would make you think that it's the biggest man made thing ever to have hit the plant. It's 'giant', after all. Except that if you use that word to describe something that weighs about the same as a luton van with some large furniture in the back, what word do you use to describe the 77 tonne Skylab that de-orbited and fell onto Western Australia in 1979? And since the article specifically mentions that Skylab was the 'biggest piece of space debris to fall from orbit' I wonder why The Teletubbygraph felt the need to spice up the headline with the giant thing. 32 years ago the rather more worrying news that 77 tonnes of space junk hit a populated country, albeit a pretty sparsely populated one and in a mostly empty area, was reported like this:
And the NYT headline now? A very un-scary 'Satellite to land, somewhere'.
Why is it the British press doing the beat ups? Why has the once respected Teletubbygraph joined in? Harden the fuck up, for heaven's sake.
We're doomed. Doomed, I tell you, dooooo...
... oh, just the size of a bus and weighing about six tonnes? And that's giant now, is it? I mean, I kind of assumed that giant meant, you know, giant. Biggest thing to have hit the planet since Tunguska, sort of thing. At the very least all the flapping would make you think that it's the biggest man made thing ever to have hit the plant. It's 'giant', after all. Except that if you use that word to describe something that weighs about the same as a luton van with some large furniture in the back, what word do you use to describe the 77 tonne Skylab that de-orbited and fell onto Western Australia in 1979? And since the article specifically mentions that Skylab was the 'biggest piece of space debris to fall from orbit' I wonder why The Teletubbygraph felt the need to spice up the headline with the giant thing. 32 years ago the rather more worrying news that 77 tonnes of space junk hit a populated country, albeit a pretty sparsely populated one and in a mostly empty area, was reported like this:
And the NYT headline now? A very un-scary 'Satellite to land, somewhere'.
Why is it the British press doing the beat ups? Why has the once respected Teletubbygraph joined in? Harden the fuck up, for heaven's sake.
Comments (2)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Post a new comment
Comment as a Guest, or login:
Go backConnected as (Logout)
Not displayed publicly.
Posting anonymously.
Add insightful or amusing remarks for me to think on and respond to. Or add annoying comment spam for me to waste time deleting, in which case may your genitals turn square and fester at the corners.
Unnecessary ranting and gratuitous profanity is strictly encouraged.
NB - due to some annoying pricks comment spamming lately all comments with three or more any links go into a moderation queue. If it's not spam I will publish all comments even tenuously related to whatever I was rambling about in the post. Otherwise please refer to the comments policy.
Unnecessary ranting and gratuitous profanity is strictly encouraged.
NB - due to some annoying pricks comment spamming lately all comments with three or more any links go into a moderation queue. If it's not spam I will publish all comments even tenuously related to whatever I was rambling about in the post. Otherwise please refer to the comments policy.
Comments by IntenseDebate
Satellite apocalypse
2011-09-22T23:18:00+10:00
Angry Exile
Don't Be So Fucking Silly|Journalistic crap|UK|
Macheath · 704 weeks ago
And so it was - along with pretty much every other inhabited country in the world; in fact, the news item was really Northern Canada, Alaska, Siberia, Greenland, Scandanavia and Scotland not in path of falling satellite'.
I've been following this story with interest since then. BTW, you didn't mention another gem from the Telegraph article:
'NASA has warned people not to touch the debris if they come across it because it is likely to have sharp edges'.
Sadly the paywall prevents me linking.
My recent post The sky is falling!
Angry_Exile 90p · 704 weeks ago
By the way, probably won't happen with a UK-centric article like "Britain in path of falling satellite" but The Australian syndicates articles from The Times a fair bit and is sometimes worth checking if there's something paywalled that you wanted to link.