The Angry Exile: Drugs question

The Hangman

Into our town the Hangman came,
Smelling of gold and blood and flame.
And he paced our bricks with a diffident air,
And built his frame in the courthouse square.
The scaffold stood by the courthouse side,
Only as wide as the door was wide;
A frame as tall, or little more,
Than the capping sill of the courthouse door.
And we wondered, whenever we had the time,
Who the criminal, what the crime
That the Hangman judged with the yellow twist
of knotted hemp in his busy fist.
And innocent though we were, with dread,
We passed those eyes of buckshot lead --
Till one cried: "Hangman, who is he
For whom you raised the gallows-tree?"
Then a twinkle grew in the buckshot eye,
And he gave us a riddle instead of reply:
"He who serves me best," said he,
"Shall earn the rope of the gallows-tree."
And he stepped down, and laid his hand
On a man who came from another land.
And we breathed again, for another's grief
At the Hangman's hand was our relief
And the gallows-frame on the courthouse lawn
By tomorrow's sun would be struck and gone.
So we gave him way, and no one spoke,
Out of respect for his Hangman's cloak.
The next day's sun looked mildly down
On roof and street in our quiet town,
And stark and black in the morning air
Was the gallows-tree in the courthouse square.
And the Hangman stood at his usual stand
With the yellow hemp in his busy hand;
With his buckshot eye and his jaw like a pike
And his air so knowing and business-like.
And we cried, "Hangman, have you not done
Yesterday, with the foreign one?"
Then we fell silent, and stood amazed,
"Oh, not for him was the gallows raised."
He laughed a laugh as he looked at us:
"Did you think I'd gone to all this fuss
To hang one man? That's a thing I do
To stretch a rope when the rope is new."
Then one cried "Murder!" and one cried "Shame!"
And into our midst the Hangman came
To that man's place. "Do you hold," said he,
"with him that was meant for the gallows-tree?"
And he laid his hand on that one's arm.
And we shrank back in quick alarm!
And we gave him way, and no one spoke
Out of fear of his Hangman's cloak.
That night we saw with dread surprise
The Hangman's scaffold had grown in size.
Fed by the blood beneath the chute,
The gallows-tree had taken root;
Now as wide, or a little more,
Than the steps that led to the courthouse door,
As tall as the writing, or nearly as tall,
Halfway up on the courthouse wall.
The third he took -- we had all heard tell --
Was a usurer, and an infidel.
"What," said the Hangman "have you to do
With the gallows-bound, and he a Jew?"
And we cried out, "Is this one he
Who has served you well and faithfully?"
The Hangman smiled: "It's a clever scheme
to try the strength of the gallows-beam."
The fourth man's dark, accusing song
Had scratched our comfort hard and long;
"And what concern," he gave us back.
"Have you for the doomed -- the doomed and Black?"
The fifth. The sixth. And we cried again,
"Hangman, Hangman, is this the man?"
"It's a trick," he said. "that we hangmen know
For easing the trap when the trap springs slow."
And so we ceased, and asked no more,
As the Hangman tallied his bloody score.
And sun by sun, and night by night,
The gallows grew to monstrous height.
The wings of the scaffold opened wide
Till they covered the square from side to side;
And the monster cross-beam, looking down,
Cast its shadow across the town.
Then through the town the Hangman came,
Through the empty streets, and called my name --
And I looked at the gallows soaring tall,
And thought, "There is no one left at all
For hanging, and so he calls to me
To help pull down the gallows-tree."
So I went out with right good hope
To the Hangman's tree and the Hangman's rope.
He smiled at me as I came down
To the courthouse square through the silent town.
And supple and stretched in his busy hand
Was the yellow twist of the hempen strand.
And he whistled his tune as he tried the trap,
And it sprang down with a ready snap --
And then with a smile of awful command
He laid his hand upon my hand.
"You tricked me. Hangman!," I shouted then,
"That your scaffold was built for other men...
And I no henchman of yours," I cried,
"You lied to me, Hangman. Foully lied!"
Then a twinkle grew in the buckshot eye,
"Lied to you? Tricked you?" he said. "Not I.
For I answered straight and I told you true --
The scaffold was raised for none but you.
For who has served me more faithfully
Then you with your coward's hope?" said he,
"And where are the others who might have stood
Side by your side in the common good?"
"Dead," I whispered. And amiably
"Murdered," the Hangman corrected me:
"First the foreigner, then the Jew...
I did no more than you let me do."
Beneath the beam that blocked the sky
None had stood so alone as I.
The Hangman noosed me, and no voice there
Cried "Stop!" for me in the empty square.

Maurice Ogden

Sunday, 20 March 2011

Drugs question

THE number of middle-aged users of ecstasy in Australia is rising sharply, as those who started using the drug at dance parties in the 1980s and '90s begin to enter their 30s and 40s.

Ecstasy is the second most commonly used illicit drug in Australia after cannabis, with the number of users rising steadily over the past 10 years.

But underlying the trend is a dramatic increase in the number of older adults using the drug - particularly Generation X, born between 1964 and 1981.

...

Report author Dr Rebecca McKetin said it was clear from the results that Generation X was continuing to take ecstasy as they aged because there was little evidence people began to use ecstasy after the age of 30, or that former users returned to use once they had stopped.

''The increase in the number of older ecstasy users is explained by ecstasy users who started using in the '90s, when the drug first became popular, and who have continued to use into later adulthood,'' she said.

But... but... but how is this possible? Surely if the horror death scare headlines were right they should all be dead by now. Yet if it's not the instant danger that kills more or less on the spot as we were all told (my parents bought The Daily Mail regularly) then why is it illegal?

Losing the sarcasm, it does make me wonder about the future. Alcohol is a harmful drug that is accepted and legal partly because taxing it is a revenue earner for governments and partly because nearly everyone in those same governments uses it. Perhaps as Gen X ages and some of its E using members become politicians themselves there'll come a time when a government will ask why a drug that is widely used, non-addictive, can be taken for years and doesn't turn users into slurring, staggering, vomit fountains with hair trigger tempers, and has been used regularly by some of the people actually in the government, needs to be banned when alcohol isn't.

Or perhaps the fake charities will have banned tobacco and reintroduced Prohibition by then and we'll all be concentrating on the fallout from that backwards step instead of liberalising drugs.

Comments (4)

Logging you in...

Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout

Logged in as

+2 Vote up Vote down

nisakiman 54p · 731 weeks ago

"Perhaps as Gen X ages and some of its E using members become politicians themselves there'll come a time when a government will ask why a drug that is widely used, non-addictive, can be taken for years and doesn't turn users into slurring, staggering, vomit fountains with hair trigger tempers, and has been used regularly by some of the people actually in the government, needs to be banned when alcohol isn't."

Very true, but that should have applied to cannabis with the last generation of politicians. Of course, it didn't. Once in power, they adopted the establishment orthodoxy, regardless of the fact that that orthodoxy is patently wrong. Remember Bill "but I didn't inhale" Clinton? What a sap. Didn't have the balls to stand up and be counted.

No, I'm afraid nothing short of an apocalyptic event will shake the conviction of the PTB that they know what is best for us peasants.

Meanwhile they will continue to hose billions (of our money) down the pan on a pointless, unwinnable "war on drugs", which serves only to hansomely line the pockets of the organised crime cartels who will continue to supply product(s) that are obviously very much in demand.

I despair, I really do. Are they totally, utterly fucking brainless? Doesn't it ever occur to these dumbass fuckwits that the "drug problem" is entirely of their own making? Will someone please shoot the fucking lot of them so we can start all over again?

1 reply · active 731 weeks ago

+1 Vote up Vote down

Angry_Exile 90p · 731 weeks ago

... that should have applied to cannabis with the last generation of politicians. Of course, it didn't.

You're quite right of course, it's not very likely. But with the increasing regulation of tobacco and alcohol I went the possibility that they'd end up banned as well rather than marijuana situation. And there is a ray of hope there since at least there has been a referendum on its legal status in California recently.

Are they totally, utterly fucking brainless? Doesn't it ever occur to these dumbass fuckwits that the "drug problem" is entirely of their own making? Will someone please shoot the fucking lot of them so we can start all over again?

Yes, no, and not a lot of point when people will elect the same kinds of idiots as replacements.

+1 Vote up Vote down

AmbushPredator 59p · 731 weeks ago

Of course, banning something, as we all know, just means people will revert to far more dangerous sources of intoxication. With predictable results.

1 reply · active 731 weeks ago

+1 Vote up Vote down

Angry_Exile 90p · 731 weeks ago

Yep, and again the US experience with prohibition of alcohol should have been a lesson. When beer, wine and spirits became hard to find people turned to industrial alcohol as well as illegal - and therefore quite possibly adulterated - supplies. The fact that the US government even tried spiked industrial alcohol itself and achieved nothing but even more dead makes it pretty clear that the ban approach does more harm than good.

Incidentally, one of the most important paragraphs in that link is the last one:

"Mephedrone, was banned in April after it was linked to the deaths of two teenagers. However, toxicology reports later showed that the pair had not taken the drug."

Policy led evidence, no doubt.

Post a new comment

Comment as a Guest, or login:

Tweet this comment

Connected as (Logout)

Email (optional)

Not displayed publicly.

Submit Comment

Subscribe to

Add insightful or amusing remarks for me to think on and respond to. Or add annoying comment spam for me to waste time deleting, in which case may your genitals turn square and fester at the corners.

Unnecessary ranting and gratuitous profanity is strictly encouraged.

NB - due to some annoying pricks comment spamming lately all comments with three or more any links go into a moderation queue. If it's not spam I will publish all comments even tenuously related to whatever I was rambling about in the post. Otherwise please refer to the comments policy.

Comments by IntenseDebate