Commenting.


COMMENTING
Due to the move of the blog to Wordpress posts from Jan 2012 onward will have commenting disabled (when I remember to do it)
Cheers - AE

Wednesday, 27 October 2010

The times are a-changing.

When I was a child I had more freedoms to look forward to as I grew up. Some were freedoms my parents decided I was ready for, such as crossing the road to the park on my own, riding my bike on the road, going to the local shops, sometimes with a signed note from Mum or Dad asking for a packet or two of Embassy since I was some years off 16 - I doubt many shopkeepers would do that now for fear that it was a local Trading Standards op or even that someone would simply dob them in. For others I was automatically considered ready by the state, such as buying and using my own tobacco, having sex, driving, buying alcohol* and standing for Parliament (which doesn't come with the freedom to do all the rest simultaneously although the behaviour of some MPs may suggest it comes with the misapprehension that it does). It would be a pretty depressing state of affairs if the reality was that you're born free** and then grow up looking forward to your freedom being progressively infringed and eroded, wouldn't it? Nah, surely not... that's just ol' Angry Exile's deeply ingrained cynicism, right?

Wrong, because thanks to a revoltingly authoritarian head teacher there's one neighbourhood here where kids can look forward to losing the freedom of association when they start primary school.
Students at [Osbourne Primary School in Mount Martha] on the Mornington Peninsula have been banned from congregating in groups of more than three in a bid to stop gangs of children teasing and upsetting their classmates.

...

In the latest edition of the school's newsletter, principal Liz Klein wrote that the rule was introduced to stop "gangs of students wandering around the schoolyard teasing and upsetting others for their entertainment".

The newsletter states that students are not permitted to walk around the school in groups larger than three.
What a stroke of fucking genius! Why bother teaching children right from wrong? Why go to the trouble of actually dealing with teasing and bullying as it happens? No, far easier just to ban groups larger than an arbitrarily chosen number in the knowledge belief hope that the problem will just magically go away. Oh, for fuck's sake, where do I begin with this kind of utter fucktardary?

Well, for starters there's the point that some of the parents have made:
The controversial rule ... has been criticised by some parents for punishing the whole school rather than just those students doing the wrong thing.
Quite, and doing so is not simply unjust but fucking lazy, which would be the second point. I can't imagine how the principal can even begin to justify it unless she was to suggest that it's a valuable lesson about what to expect when they're older since governments at every level will take the same lazy route of punishing largely innocent groups of people, and incidentally taking a huge, diarrheic shit all over their liberties - which is the third point - in order to get at a small number of trouble makers. Could this be the idea?

Yeah, I doubt it too. So what does the principal - and am I just being a pedantic pom approaching middle aged fartihood or does anyone else prefer 'head teacher'? - have to say for herself?
Ms Klein told 3AW today that certain students had made a habit of walking around the school in a pack aggravating others.
Certain students, yet Liz's response is a measure targeting all students.
Despite being spoken to by teachers, the students had persisted with their behaviour.
Well stack me, who'd have fucking seen that coming? And now those self same little shits can congratulate themselves for continuing to make their fellow pupils' lives at school just that little bit more miserable than they need be, all thanks to Liz Klein and her policy of don't-know-what-to-do-now-so-punishment-for-all. Fucking hell, Liz, whose side are you actually on here? The poor bloody kids who were on the receiving end are now being bullied by you and the fucking school instead of, or more likely as well as, the original bullies.

Because that's the fourth and final problem, Liz. As well as being lazy, unjust, and authoritarian your policy is going to fail as soon as the bullies work out that they only need to split into pairs and target lone kids, which I suspect they might be able to do faster than you did. You're assuming that in a group of three bullying can no longer take place, and simple mathematics - do you teach that at Osbourne? - should be enough to work out that in such a group two children can still gang up on the third. Fucking hell, woman, that's more or less how democracies function. Another lesson, perhaps?

Yeah, right.


* Yes, I realise this means that they are not really freedoms as such, but I'm in a bit of a rush and a discussion on freedoms, liberties and negative and positive rights wasn't the point of this post.
** If you have now got Matt Munro singing in your heads, I have an idea how old you are.*** And if you think beauty surrounds you as well then I also have an idea that you may be on drugs. Or just bloody lucky.
*** If you also have a cat it knows. Trust me, it just does. And its contempt for you has just doubled.

Comments (11)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Sadly not. The Age can read a bit 'Mashie' sometimes but it's probably better to think of it as like a Down Under Graun/Indie, except read the right way up. :)
And how are they going to enforce the rule? Are they going to have a teacher in every corridor, every room, every corner of the building to ensure that there always just groups of three or less. It would be a lot easier to do a bit more than just speak with the problem kids and take some sanctions against them. Maybe even detention. But then the lefty fluffy wuffies will say that it's against their human rights to detain them. What does making them stand in groups of three of less do then? Stupidity is endemic in the authortarian left.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
As per the norm for this kind of thinking the idea seems to be to introduce the rule first and worry about how to enforce it later, if indeed enforcement is even possible. The main thing seems to be to have rules and if by some miracle they're actually workable that's a happy bonus. As you say, stupidity is endemic among authoritarians.
No matter where you go in the world, it seems teachers everywhere cannot think.
1 reply · active 752 weeks ago
The Peter Principle is an essential part of education careers.
SBML points out the real reason. And until the scourge of "Uman Rights" is firmly kicked into touch, this sort of crap will continue. I can't pretend that bullying didn't go on in my day (I'm a 54 something grizzly old fart, by the way), but back then teachers, and particularly the head, were able to exert authority. Unless you were really masochistic, it was a good idea to behave.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I could be wrong but the 'uman rights' industry doesn't seem as well established here as in the UK. The Constitution has no Bill of Rights like the US version and there's no separate Act like Britain has, and we don't have some federal idiots forcing barmy ideas on us from outside (that's what Canberra is for ;) ). This may well be a product of a similar kind of mind but I feel it's come more from being too chickenshit to deal with the problem sensibly, probably along the lines suggested below by the occasional reader.
An occasional reader's avatar

An occasional reader · 752 weeks ago

The blanket proscription of gatherings > 3 children seems pointless, but isn't the whole exercise futile? Teasing and verbal abuse is probably present at every school. And probably in society in general, albeit in a milder form.

Maybe Principal Klein should discipline the (identified) miscreants, whilst telling some of the 'victims' to shrug off occasional abuse.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Very true, and if schools are about teaching life skills these days then a good one to teach would be how to tell when a comment is meant with real malice and when there's nothing serious meant by it. And I absolutely agree that where there's real bullying the principal needs to stop hand wringing and take some sanctions against the actual perpetrators, while helping kids grow thicker skins for the lighter stuff.
Stephen Brown's avatar

Stephen Brown · 752 weeks ago

Ha! As soon as I read about "groups of no more than three" I thought, "Right, that's two bullies and a victim!" which is exactly the point you made later in the article.
I know full well that it is easy to comment "When I were a lad it were different...." but it really was different. The Head Master was quick to 'modify' the behaviour of the more overt of the bullies. It was a lesson in behavioural therapy to witness the efficacy of Six of the Best applied to the posterior of the malefactors!
Other bullies were dealt with by their would-be victims in many cases. I changed High Schools during my second year and became the intended victim of a fat slob of a bully in my new school. For a week or more he hounded me, culminating in a challenge to a fight in the toilet block at break-time. He was gob-smacked when I turned up, alone. He was with his bunch of fawning acolytes to whom he commented what he was going to do to me as he started to remove his blazer. Which is when I hit him. Hard. In his fat gut. Three times! He went down so I hit him again and again as hard as I could. He rolled to escape, right into the urinal trough. Which is where he lay, in tears, when I pissed on him. His acolytes left, speechless.
I was called to the Head's office about an hour later (the bully had been taken home by his irate Mother) to explain why I was being blamed for the state of a vomiting pupil who reeked of urine. I was quaking in my shoes when I explained.
Once I'd finished speaking the Head was silent for a moment then he asked how I was. I assured him that I was fine. He then delivered a twenty-second homily how such situations were best dealt with by reference to a member of the school-staff before dismissing me. My would-be oppressor stayed away from me for the next three years.
I was never bullied by anyone again in that school!
Let the kids grow up enough to sort out their own problems, it's what they're going to have to do later in life.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Related Posts with Thumbnails