Commenting.


COMMENTING
Due to the move of the blog to Wordpress posts from Jan 2012 onward will have commenting disabled (when I remember to do it)
Cheers - AE

Saturday, 23 October 2010

Nadine comes clean?

How the Christ this became newsworthy here I've no idea since I can't imagine that many Australians know or care who Nadine Dorries is, but all the same this appeared in The Aussie.
A BRITISH MP enraged her constituents and her party after letting slip that her blog, which tells people how hard she works, is "70 per cent fiction".

Nadine Dorries, a Conservative MP for Mid Bedfordshire in southern England, made the admission to investigators during a sleaze inquiry that cleared her of abusing the Government’s expenses system but found that she misled voters.
70 per cent fiction? Fancy that.*
According to documents published by the Standards and Privileges Committee, Ms Dorries said: "My blog is 70 per cent fiction and 30 perc ent fact. It is written as a tool to enable my constituents to know me better and to reassure them of my commitment to Mid Bedfordshire.”
Oh, Nadine, you are a dear. If they knew you better they might not have voted you back in, don't you think? And if your blog is 70% fiction then perhaps that's why. Or is because you know that there's more than enough tribal Tory voters in your constituency who would vote for a compost heap with a blue rosette on the top without too much doubt, so they wouldn't think twice about voting for you, fictional blog and fictional second home expense claims notwithstanding.

Baaaaaaaa. Baaaaaaaaaa.

But Ms Dorries later told the BBC that she had been told by police to disguise her movements on her blog, adding that "actually, I think I meant to say it's 30 percent fiction".
And I'd like to think that more than 70% of us should be less than 30% convinced by that.


* No, in every sense.

Comments (2)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Give her credit, it's a great excuse for cheating the system. It just sounds so much like a naughty child coming up with an ingenious but wacky excuse when it's obvious they did something wrong. And then they embelish the lie with more lies - that the police told her to fib on the blog to hide her movements - as if she is that special. Except that instead of a parent who can see through the lie you have lawyers and politicians who believe that the accused must be totally and utterly found to be in the wrong. They'll take any slightly believable excuse hook line and sinker.

There is no doubt whatsoever that she cheated the system.
1 reply · active 753 weeks ago
None at all, or she wouldn't have been ordered to apologise. But that's another thing. Even if you accept that an apology somehow magically makes it all okay again how sincere is it when she's been ordered to do it. It's just one 'fuck you' after another to the taxpayers who fund this venal woman and her fellow politicians.

Correction: Nads has not been ordered to apologise. I was thinking of Baroness Uddin. Mea culpa, all these troughers just look the fucking same to me.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Related Posts with Thumbnails