Commenting.


COMMENTING
Due to the move of the blog to Wordpress posts from Jan 2012 onward will have commenting disabled (when I remember to do it)
Cheers - AE

Wednesday, 30 November 2011

Questions to which the answer is "No"

Cick for linky
... the question arises, should the rest of the world take over management of Europe to prevent or mitigate disaster? Specifically, should the US Federal Reserve assume leadership as a monetary superpower and impose policy on a paralyzed ECB, acting as a global lender of last resort?
And for the answer I think we should turn to one of those well worn graphical illustrations of how deep America's debt rabbit hole goes. This one is an excellent example from usdebt.kleptocracy.us. The first image shows the approximate US public debt by the end of the year if it was a piles of actual size $100 bills compared to quite a famous landmark, and the second shows that plus its unfunded liabilities.



If you've read the captions on those images (you can embiggerfy, or better yet go look at the original where you can see a similar representation of the US budget for 2011) you'll have noticed that the first of those, the $15 trillion pile, is roughly the size of the Gross Domestic Product for the entire United States. In fact the captions are a little out of date - US debt will not now reach 100% of GDP by Christmas 2011 because that happened four weeks ago.

So actually the answer to the question of whether the US Federal Reserve should act as Europe's lender of last resort is not just "No" - it's "With what?"

Comments (2)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
The question is, Who has money? Answer: no one willing to lend to profligate fuckers who will never pay it back. It's the same shit over and over. The US has twice defaulted in the 20th century which just goes to show that if you lend money to a democratic government, you're never going to get it back. Trying to get it back is like the ultimate bank run. The government might try to tax to pay it back or inflate, both of which would ultimately lead to downfall if the debt is big enough (hint: it is). There is no way the Europeans, British or Americans are ever going to pay back what they owe. There are ways they could do it but they are totally uninterested in persuing those ways, because that would get them voted out. It's the tyranny of the poor majority who have been siphoning money from the middle class for ages, then borrowed money from the rest of the world to continue living for free. Now in America, there pretty much is no middle class any more and Britain seems much the same. Deficit reduction is not the answer. Stimulus plans are not the answer. Regulations are definitely not the answer. The only way back to real growth is to stop taxing so damn much and no government will ever propose to reduce its own power.
1 reply · active 695 weeks ago
Yes, it's another legal Ponzi scheme, isn't it? Those who lend before the balloon goes up see a return, but the warning signs really ought to be clear for all to see - when a government can't even reduce their deficit, much less run at a surplus, it's inevitable that sooner or later someone's going to lose their money. Just as you say, if they don't default they'll inflate until the value of the return is worthless.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Related Posts with Thumbnails