Commenting.


COMMENTING
Due to the move of the blog to Wordpress posts from Jan 2012 onward will have commenting disabled (when I remember to do it)
Cheers - AE

Monday, 21 November 2011

Flying looks about to get a whole lot... er, similar

Great news! You can go on holiday and take liquids with you. Medicines, baby milk, drinks bought away from the airport at considerable less than ludicrous prices, all will soon be allowed through the ring-piece of steel at international airports in Australia, and no doubt other nations.
International travellers will no longer have water bottles, perfumes and other liquids confiscated as they board planes under a radical overhaul of airport security.
Radical overhaul. Sounds good, sounds like it could be what's been needed for a while now.
The easing of restrictions will begin next year as Australia's international airports begin rolling out new explosive detection equipment.
Ah. Now it just sounds like another machine to queue up for.
The shake-up, to be announced by the federal government today, also promises to cut waiting times for passengers by easing bottlenecks at security gates.
Er, but if we've got one more machine to queue up for how's that going to cut times?
The new technology, which has been trialled at Sydney airport, would enable authorities to detect the smallest trace of explosives in liquids.
Okay, and what happens if someone decides to take a pint of the stuff into the queue for the machine and detonate it before they get there? In the queue. You know, attacking the people in the fucking queue instead of screwing around with the impossible task of getting it on a plane. Well, sort of impossible.
  • January 7th 2011, undercover French journalists are reported to have smuggled a dismantled 9mm pistol through security at two French airports and were able to assemble the gun in the toilets on the plane.
  • February 21st 2011, in the US a female undercover TSA agent is reported to have carried a handgun through Dallas/Fort Worth airport body scanners in multiple tests by hiding it in her knickers.
  • [...]
  • June 13th 2011, it is reported that 30 staff at Honolulu International Airport are fired for not having screened luggage properly.
Still, long as somebody has got a nice big market for their feel good bomb sniffing machines and governments can carry on acting as if they're doing something, eh?
"It will make air travel easier and less stressful for passengers as well as free airport security staff to better focus on their core screening responsibilities without the distraction of having to confiscate items from people's bags," [Federal Transport Minister Anthony Albanese] said.
"While preventing acts of terrorism remains our number one priority, we're also determined to minimise the disruption and inconvenience experienced by passengers as they transit throughout major airports, including by deploying the latest technologies."
Sorry, Tony, but if you're really serious about that I still think you should be looking at how the Israelis do things. In the meantime one more bloody thing to queue up for having already queued for check-in, the X-ray, the metal detector and the bollock baking body scanner and/or professional groper does not tempt me back into flying anywhere except as a last resort.

Comments (6)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
AE , if a terrorist actually decides to take out Airport Security somewhere and all the waiting passengers it will cause mayhem and no-one can stop it. Once a terrorist decides to do it... that's it ... it will happen. Everybody conveniently forgot about the Moscow Airport Arrivals bomb very quickly ... l wonder why? :)

As it is you can book online, avoid checkin and take your cabin luggage straight to Airport Security. You can get a lot of stuff in a case 55cm x 45cm x 25cm ... and it's on wheels so weight does not matter. The whole Airport Security is just a bloody circus staffed by clowns watching the passengers perform. lt protects no-one!
My recent post Tobacco Seized from N2D by UKBA/HMRC
1 reply · active 696 weeks ago
Quite, and though as I've said before the Moscow bomb was in arrivals there's no reason at all it couldn't have gone off in a queue for one of the security theatre checkpoints. I forgot about online check in though. Shows you how often I fly, or rather how often I manage to avoid it.
It was always a case of something being seen to be done - like Victorians* prescribed noxious patent medicines, the nastier the travelling experience, the more we're supposed to think the measures are doing us all good.

I admit I'm biased. You know when you have to queue for ages at security because some poor mug at the scanner is having to remove most of their clothes? That'd be me (sorry!). Due to a weird electromagnetic field or something, I set the things off with depressing regularity even when I've removed all metal objects from my person - I've had my bags and shoes rummaged through by innumerable spaniels and been been groped with official sanction in more places than I care to remember.

*ie 19th century English people (for any Australians puzzled at their compatriots' alleged attitude to healthcare)
My recent post Quote of the week
1 reply · active 696 weeks ago
The missus often has the same effect. Go through, set it off, get told to go back and remove metal before trying again, set it off once more, get wanded, etc. Lots of women seem to. I'm sure the damn things are getting more sensitive and starting to pick up the smallest bit of metal in a bra.
I agree about women - actually being one, contrary to online appearances - and always try to wear metal-free underwear when flying (though I doubt if I could remove my wedding ring if I tried, I'm told it won't affect the scanners). However, the baffled expression of a guard running a madly beeping scanner over my bare arm or leg is one with which I have sadly become familiar.

My theory is that it has something to do with migraines, which affect more women than men. By the time I get to the front of the queue, I'm almost invariably brewing an evil bastard-behind-the-eyes; on the few occasions I wasn't, I've gone through without incident.

My recent post Quote of the week
1 reply · active 696 weeks ago
Funny, isn't it. Even though we know that everyone in the blogosphere must have the same variety of underpants contents as in RW, and sometimes we even know in a general sense what the contents are for certain bloggers, but when you get down to it the blogosphere contains only one sex: bloggers. At least that's how I see it. Admittedly in your case you've got the standard Intense Debate male-ish silhouette avatar and I hadn't read your Blogger profile properly and seen the clue at the end. I must also admit that I didn't know women's arms and legs were made out of metal. Mrs Exile must be keeping things from me, :D

Post a new comment

Comments by

Related Posts with Thumbnails