Commenting.


COMMENTING
Due to the move of the blog to Wordpress posts from Jan 2012 onward will have commenting disabled (when I remember to do it)
Cheers - AE

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

Ladies, your nads are mad Nad's

Well, if not your gonads then at least your reproductive tract, or so the self-righteously silly bitch seems to think. I was going to rant about it but Mummy Long Legs already has and The Daily Mash have covered the bit that really bothers me, that anyone else gets a say over someone else's body parts, more entertainingly that I could have.
After realising the nation's wombs were being used wrongly, Dorries wants abortions to be available only to women who can complete a series of physical and mental challenges, equivalent to competing simultaneously in Mastermind and Total Wipeout.

[...]

She added: "It is now time for me to fulfill my destiny as gatekeeper at the uterus of every woman in Britain, shooing away gynaecologists like a vagina-based Cerberus in lipstick and fuck-me shoes."
Vagina based Cerberus in lipstick

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I'm fairly new to the Libertarian philosophy but most of it makes sense to me, except you view of abortion. Surely abortion is not about doing what you want with your own uterus, as you put it, but to do what you want with the life of another, who just happens to be living in it? It seems incongruous to promote the liberty of one at the expense of the life of another.
1 reply · active 707 weeks ago
There is certainly a point in a pregnancy at which ending it is indeed promoting the liberty of one over the life of another, but there is also a point at which preventing termination would be restricting the liberty of one for the sake of a few foreign cells which might never become a full term pregnancy anyway. My view of abortion is actually the same as that of Nadine Dorries - I suspect it might be a bit of Catholic culture that's almost impossible to shake off and for various reasons I wouldn't want to shake it off even if it was easy. But does that mean I can impose that view on anyone else. The libertarian in me says no and that pre-embryonic cells and even very early embryos (which are actually more likely than not to never become a person even if left to nature) have no right to trump the woman's ownership of her own body, though the libertarian in me also says that when a pregnancy is further on abortion is basically murder and should be treated as such. The grey areas are large and navigating them is neither straightforward or briefly described. Expect a longer post on the subject in the next day or two.
jameshigham's avatar

jameshigham · 707 weeks ago

Head's still reeling from this one.
1 reply · active 707 weeks ago
On the bright side I resisted the temptation to Photoshop two extra heads on to Nads.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Related Posts with Thumbnails