Commenting.


COMMENTING
Due to the move of the blog to Wordpress posts from Jan 2012 onward will have commenting disabled (when I remember to do it)
Cheers - AE

Tuesday, 12 April 2011

Veil fail

Well, we all knew the French were going to go ahead with their plan to liberate women by ordering them about what they should wear, and predictably enough the tiny minority who do go veiled are a bit pissed off about it.
Kenza Drider, a 32-year-old, travelled to Paris from her home in Provence to force a confrontation with police, and was one of those arrested.
There were minor scuffles as officers apprehended her outside Notre Dame Cathedral together with another niqab-wearer staging an illegal demonstration against the new law.
So not just dictating to women over their choice of clothing but also telling them they may not protest and arresting them if they don't comply. Yep, that's women's lib alright. I'd recognise it anywhere.

/facepalm
Although Belgium has approved a ban in principle, France is the first to introduce a full ban on a garment which immigration minister Eric Besson has called a "walking coffin".
While French women face fines and "civic duty" guidance if they break the law, men who force their wives or daughters to wear burkas will face up to a year in prison, and fines of up to £25,000.
Don't get me wrong, I think it looks daft as well, though I've always described it as looking like a Ninja version of Demis Roussos, and it should go without saying that I have no problem with the law going after men who force females in their family to wear veils when they'd rather not. But if a woman wants to then for fuck's sake let her. I haven't hit my head and come over all PC here. I just feel that it's her life, her choice, and respecting her wishes even if we don't like them or view them as archaic is what's truly liberal. Forcing her to dress as we'd prefer is anything but.

Still, in the spirit of compromise I've had a look through the interwebs and found that someone has already created an ensemble outfit which should be an acceptable middle ground. Or at least offensive to everybody.

Comments (2)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Yeah, isn't it? I suppose it's to be expected as a natural consequence of the perceived special treatment given to Muslims by western governments but people aren't giving full thought either to the illogical claim that banning something brings more freedom or the precedent. What if someone suggests banning pencil skirts, which after all are designed to be flattering to a woman's hips and backside and must therefore be more about pleasing men? What if someone suggests a maximum height for heels (which would gradually become lower to the point only flats were allowed, natch) on similar grounds - risking a broken ankle just to make your legs look longer for the benefit of men? Push up bras and lacy and/or racy lingerie? Not on, sisters, not on. Tights but not stockings, plain underwear like your nanna used to wear during the war, A-line skirts or better yet, trousers (but loose fitting because VPL will also be outlawed as something that reduces a woman's freedom to not have her arse checked out) and sensible shoes only, that's how it must be. And it's all to increase your liberty, just like it was when we stopped those Muslim women from wearing burkhas...

...you know, the ones you don't see anymore because they don't come out of their houses.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Related Posts with Thumbnails