Commenting.


COMMENTING
Due to the move of the blog to Wordpress posts from Jan 2012 onward will have commenting disabled (when I remember to do it)
Cheers - AE

Sunday, 10 April 2011

That white fluffy stuff appearing over your eyes is wool

Still, nice try on the part of George Osbourne.
The Chancellor said he remained focused on reducing the UK's budget deficit, which stands at about £122bn this year, as he spoke at a meeting of European finance ministers and central bank governors in Hungary.
"I made it clear that unlike the Irish case the UK will not be making a bilateral loan to Portugal. British taxpayers' money will not be lent directly to Portugal," he said.
I hope everyone has spotted that the operative word Georgie Boy is using there is 'directly'. He has to say that because he know sdamn well that he has no ability, none whatsoever, to prevent British taxpayers' money going to Portugal indirectly as long as the UK hands over £9 billion a year to the European Union, the entity now hosing money at Portugal and whose income of course comes from the taxes of member states' citizens. £9 bn is about 7 or 8 per cent of your budget deficit there, George, and you're giving it to people who are in turn going to 'lend' about £90 bn to Portugal. Or to look at it another way, the money will go to Portugal over the next three years and Britain's EU contributions during that time will be getting close to £30 billion, or a third of the value of the loan.

But it's okay because George says that there will be no direct loan from Britain to Portugal. Any money that comes from the £30 billion that he'll have taken at gunpoint from British citizens and given to the EU is indirect and somehow doesn't count. And in a way I suppose it doesn't since once it's gone it's gone and it makes little practical difference where it ends up. Doesn't help the deficit much, let alone the actual nation debt, but presumably Georgie is hoping to save a few quid by closing some tax avoidance loopholes reducing the number of perfectly legal methods of minimising tax liabilities (with an exception clause for disHonourable Members of Parliament, natch).
New tax year, same old MPs. After Budget promises to tackle tax avoidance, Parliament is passing legislation to block several loopholes – but an obscure clause specifically exempts MPs from these new restrictions.
...
“HM Revenue & Customs says that this legislation is only there to stop ‘tax avoidance’. However, Section 554E(8) specifically exempts members of the House of Commons and the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority from the new legislation in situations where they are actually caught by it.”
Do go read the whole thing, and if you were one of the 25 million or so who voted for the usual suspects last year I hope it's a wake up call - nothing significant has changed. Oh, about 150 troughers didn't bother to stand again and a bunch more lost their seats, a few of them are going to prison, Labour has gone into opposition, the Speaker was replaced even before the election, and Britain now has the LibConservial Dimotive Cobbleition running things, but all the same nothing significant has changed. Just look around. The government is still spending money it hasn't got at an ever accelerating rate (just accelerating less rapidly than under the snot munching madman), it's still intending to make current and, in the case of the national debt, future tax payers foot the bills, and both it and the political class from which it comes are conspiring to give themselves breaks and advantages so they can continue to avoid the pain they're going to inflict on the proles. I'm not even going to begin to cover the continuing nannying of almost every fucking thing imaginable or, in contrast to pre-election talk, the decidedly lukewarm attitude to personal liberty. There is, as I've said before, not three main parties but one with three wings, and with a few notable exceptions all three wings are composed entirely of cunts who can neither be trusted to look after your businesses, your welfare or your wallet.

So if you voted for the usual mob, especially if you did it to keep one of the 'other two' out and even more so if it was something along the lines of your parents always voted that way, I do hope you're thoroughly fucking proud of yourself now.* This time round you had any number of independents, micro parties, and mini-parties to choose from, UKIP being only the most well known and LPUK being the one that would bring you the most freedom, but 25 million of you still chose to vote for Labour, Conservatives or the inappropriately named Liberal Democrats.*

As the man in the mask put it, if you want to know who to blame you need only look in a mirror. In the meantime if the fact that George Osbourne is removing your opportunity to pay less tax at the same time as handing over more of it to the EU so they can give it to member states whose governments have been even more profligate than any of Britain's, I can recommend a cast iron strategy for legally avoiding UK tax entirely:

Just get the fuck out of there.


* The same applies if you voted for your parents' party's opponents. Fair enough if you were one of the fortunate few with a decent offering from the usual lot, and the same applies if there really wasn't any decent independent or minor party option and you were left with the choice of the least worst candidate or not voting at all. Personally I'd spoil the ballot paper first but in any case I'm not talking to you but to the vast numbers who voted for similarity in the expectation of change, often for very poor reasons that they really hadn't thought much about.

Comments (10)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Thing is on balance I rather like this land so I am going to 'do a gypsy' and move to a cash, stuff and sterling silver based personal economy and walk away from my old identity. I'm sure all this is achievable without doing a Reggie Perrin.
1 reply · active 728 weeks ago
Not a bad idea anywhere but is it enough in Britain unless many others do likewise? If the guy you need to do business with is getting bent over by the government he's going to have to charge you more than he would otherwise. Paying cash may save a few quid but not getting screwed would be even better for everyone. Unfortunately the guys taking it in turns to drive the big bus are too busy squabbling over whose turn it is to hold the steering wheel to give much thought over the approaching cliff top or using the fucking brake, and that's going to affect everyone on board no matter how much they paid for their ticket and with what.
Just get the fuck out of there.

'tis done oh! exiled one. Took from November 2007 until December 2009, but self, wife and kid have fucked off this Septic Isle and moved onto pastures new.

When I told my wife (not a UK citizen) at the end of 2007 that the UK was clearly bankrupt and only being held together by a bubble of cheap inflated money, she refused to believe me. Fortunately, we got out in time unlike the rest of the poor folks still stuck there.

I'm beginning to feel like one of those Jews that saw the light in the mid 1930's and fled Germany for pastures new.
1 reply · active 728 weeks ago
Got a familiar ring to it, though for me it was the missus who kept saying how fucked up it was and that I'd admitted that Oz was in better shape. Still is, but sadly for wannabe migrants it's now fucking expensive to move here from Britain because of the UK recession, the piss poor exchange rate and the housing boom and rising cost of living in many Australian cities. It's getting to the point where you'll need to be fairly loaded to make moving to Oz worthwhile, in which case life in the UK probably won't be hurting so much anyway. Bit of a catch 22, that.
I spotted that Angry E and Ozzybourne was in action at Church House a few days ago to signal this coagulation's committment to cutting red tape for businesses...yeah fookin' right! He even got his second arsehole, Vince Cable, into action to back up the coagulations 'committment' to cutting red tape that businesses, no matter how large or small, are crumbling under the weight of here in the UK. But one little remark from the heads of this coagulation was very, very telling, and I quote:

…the Prime Minister has made clear he expects the onus to be on deregulation rather than maintaining the status quo, although European laws and tax red tape are exempt from the exercise.

It's not what they say, it's how they say it! I wish more of us 'plebs' would realise that.
http://freedom-2-choose.blogspot.com/2011/04/time...

Have a good Monday morning AE, it's still a drunken Sunday afternoon for me.
My recent post The time has come- the walrus said- to speak of many things…except the smoking ban!
1 reply · active 728 weeks ago
Very telling quote indeed. Emphasise deregulation but not for the primary sources of regulation.

/headdesk

Fuck me, that hurt.
Hmmmm... er... do I have to think of somewhere on this planet? ;) Yeah, good point, you've got me there. Australia certainly isn't, and I've got a bunch of bookmarks of stories to blog if I get time before they're old enough to be irrelevant. But is the whole country being bent over to pay not just for government brainfarts here but also the brainfarts of unelected bureautwats somewhere else who think taking money from the citizens of one state (with the complicity of their own government) and giving it to the spendthrift fuckwits misruling another is in any way fair. Mind you, maybe people in Tasmania look at Canberra the same way.

Anyhoo, the point was just that if you're fed up with the iniquities of paying tax in Britain there's one sure fire way to stop altogether. Moving to Utopia is unfortunately not an option for all the obvious reasons, but if I find out where the bastard place is I'll be sure to give you a heads up.
Yeah, that looks like a disaster waiting to happen just so it can turn into a catastrophe.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Related Posts with Thumbnails