Commenting.


COMMENTING
Due to the move of the blog to Wordpress posts from Jan 2012 onward will have commenting disabled (when I remember to do it)
Cheers - AE

Tuesday, 18 October 2011

In Masho veritas?

Well, if it applies to wine couldn't it apply to The Daily Mash talking here about the 'Occupy' mob's spread from New York to other cities?
... first-time protestor, Roy Hobbs, insisted: "I'm here because I'm sick and tired of all the greed that stops me from getting what I want.

"That's why I've come up with a plan that will solve everything. It involves dividing all the money in the world equally and then waiting to see what happens next."
You know, I really believer that is the plan. I really, really do.

Comments (8)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
My ol' Swiss Father-in-Law always used to say that if you divided up all the money in the world and distributed it equally, within a year the haves and the have-nots would all be sorted out back to where they were originally. There's quite a bit of truth in that, and me suspect our friend Mr. Roy Hobbs in the article above would be right back down in the gutter after a year.

"The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."
1 reply · active 701 weeks ago
Indeed, Bawb, and it's the great failure of that dream of equality, because people just ain't equal and there's no way to make 'em so. But don't worry about Roy Hobbs because he'll be alright. In addition to being a first time protestor he's the Assistant Chief Constable of West Midlands Police, a retired metalworker, a councillor, owner of a hardware shop, head of the English Cricket Board, deputy chairman of the Royal Institute of Chartered Engineers and whatever else The Daily Mash need him to be. :D
jameshigham's avatar

jameshigham · 701 weeks ago

I believe in dividing all the money in the world equitably too. Whatever percentage of the nation's capital was earned by you - that's the percentage you get. Whatever has been saved by me - that's the percentage I get. Sounds pretty equal to me.
1 reply · active 701 weeks ago
Ah, that'd catch some of the protestors out. I think not all of them realise that equitable and equal don't mean quite the same thing. Once again I'm tempted to call for carpet bombing people with dictionaries.
nisakiman's avatar

nisakiman · 701 weeks ago

"...involves dividing all the money in the world equally..."

Well, you must admit that there is a certain beauty in the simplicity of the idea. If it wasn't for the inconvenient fact that people tend to be different, it could even be a good idea. Just like communism, the theory is ok, but it doesn't take into account the fact that some will always be more equal than others.
1 reply · active 701 weeks ago
An even more beautiful idea would be one that would actually work.
Timmy points out at http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2011/10/1... that actually, somewhere in the region of 50% of Americans are in the top 1% globally. If they really want to distribute the money equally, they'd surely not want to leave out all the poor and destitute in the third world, and that would mean all of us in the western world becoming a lot poorer.

But that's not what they mean of course - they only want to take things from those who have more than they do - after all, the fact that they have so much more than those in the third world is completely irrelevant...
My recent post Climate Change - why it bugs me
1 reply · active 696 weeks ago
Apologies for this comment going missing. Unfortunately it ended up being mistaken by Intense Debate as spam and more unfortunately I didn't notice until today. You'd have deserved a h/t in the Occupy Everywhere post on Nov 9th which makes a similar point a fortnight after you'd brought it up. :$

Post a new comment

Comments by

Related Posts with Thumbnails