Johann Hari, a multiple award winning political journalist who writes for newspapers around the world, was exposed after a reader noticed that a quote in one of his stories had been cut and pasted from a book.Ahahahahahahahahahaha.
Such was the controversy that he was forced to respond in a personal blog, but his defence only further fuelled the intensity of the attacks against him.Ahahahaha.
On Twitter, the micro-blogging website, users posted a series of jokes in which famous sayings in history were re-created as if Mr Hari had been told them in intimate interviews, while blogs from rival journalists accusing him of so-called "churnalism".Ahahaha? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Hooooo.
At one point his alleged plagiarism was the second most discussed topic on Twitter and even became the subject of a doctored clip from Downfall, a film about Adolf Hitler's final hours.
The backlash began when a left wing website analysed an interview Mr Hari conducted with Antonio Negri, an Italian Marxist, in 2004. The blog found that Mr Hari used a quote in the interview which appeared to have been taken from Negri on Negri, a book published a year earlier.Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaohfuckithurtsnow.
[...]
The blog goes on reveal that a passage from pages 100 and 101 of the book is almost identical.
Brian Whelan, another blogger, subsequently found a further example in a 2010 interview by Mr Hari with the Israeli journalist Gideon Levy. He found a passage that appeared to be composed of sentences that had appeared in a column written by Levy the previous March.
[Hari] claimed that he had only used the quotes to make his interviewee appear more articulate, and said he had not received a complaint in a 10 years.Ahahahahahaha. Ahaha. Aha. Okay, I'll be okay. Heheheh.
He wrote: "So occasionally, at the point in the interview where the subject has expressed an idea, I’ve quoted the idea as they expressed it in writing, rather than how they expressed it in speech." However the response failed to dampen the backlash against him.
Last night the Media Standards Trust, which funds the Orwell prize, demanded an investigation to see whether he should be stripped of the award.And so the lesson is quote by all means - and I do it extensively myself - but be honest and open and fucking source it.* This seems to be pretty much par for the course in the blogosphere and I thought it was for the MSM too. Perhaps not so much anymore.
It said that the issue had "the potential to damage its reputation".
The organisers of the award said they were following a "process" normally carried out in "situation such as this".
UPDATE - can open, worms everywhere.
He also falsely claimed that none of his subjects had ever complained following the publication of one of his interviews. In fact, Noam Chomsky complained bitterly.
It now appears that Mr Hari has made quite a habit of pinching quotes given to other interviewers, and claiming that they were given to him.Admittedly I've not read a lot of his stuff and this may be miles off, but I've got the impression that if Hari caught a journo from the Wail or the Teletubbygraph or somewhere else in the non-lefty bit of the media he'd call them on it in a heartbeat.
UPDATE 2 - And he's now been Mashed.
The criticism came after Hari used a revolutionary new interview technique that involved pretending people had said things to him and then imagining what his reaction would have been if they had have said those things to him, which they did not and in fact said to somebody else years ago.Gold.
* Though I realise I may not be the first person to say that.
thylacosmilus 62p · 717 weeks ago
Angry_Exile 90p · 717 weeks ago
AllSeeingEye 55p · 717 weeks ago
Splendid post, too. I liked it because when I first read that article I reacted exactly the same way as you did. Even the pauses for breath to rearrange my ribs were at the same time as yours.
They say that the best posts you read are the ones you were thinking yourself but weren't fast enough to write down. You hit it word for word :-)
Angry_Exile 90p · 717 weeks ago
Angry_Exile 90p · 717 weeks ago
@JmsHigham · 717 weeks ago
Call me stupid but I can't really see the problem with that. Quotes from books, journals, wherever ...
Angry_Exile 90p · 717 weeks ago
'In his book last year, Antonio Negri wrote that [insert good quote]. Speaking to me now he adds [insert what he actually said to Hari].'
How hard is that? Sure, it adds a little length to the piece, but on the plus side it's transparent about the source of each statement and if given more than the twenty seconds' or so thought that I put into the line above could be made into an expansion on the earlier remark. Not quite sure how that'd work with the other examples where he's pulled quotes actually given to other journalists but perhaps variations along the lines of:
'Speaking [whenever, optionally to whom] he said that [insert good quote], an opinion he hasn't altered as he says to me [insert quote to Hari].'
Why Hari didn't do that and instead wrote articles that ended up looking as if those bits written elsewhere were in fact given personally to Hari I have no idea, but I'd call it lazy and sloppy writing at best, and at worst plagiarism in spirit even if it might not quite meet the dictionary definition.