Okay, maybe it's because I grew up with a female PM running the country that it's really not a big deal to me, but is all this 'Australia's first female PM' shite really necessary? She might be the first here in Oz but it's 20-fucking-10 for Christ's sake and there have been female PMs before elsewhere. I can think of at least four beside Thatcher. So can the world please just get over the contents of her underpants and focus on the contents of her head.
UPDATE - and although it's "first" in a different sense,
"First Bloke"? Really?
For fuck's sweet sake.
Well they haven't got to the contents of her head yet but are getting there. They have discovered and given a hell of in depth coverage to her hair colour.
ReplyDeleteFair dincum mate, you just can't hide anything from our investigative news hounds.
In both cases, there is nothing there?
ReplyDeleteJim, I've played the ranga card myself already so I can't have too much of a go at the interest in her hair colour, but I do hope it's not going to be like the British press were when I was a kid and every time she changes her do it gets a mention.
ReplyDeleteChuckles, bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha.