tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3267928368747294421.post6299999363013708252..comments2023-09-06T22:58:43.907+10:00Comments on The Angry Exile: It's not because of safety that this is wrong.Angry Exilehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13697765915987279791noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3267928368747294421.post-34019457618881335522010-01-22T11:13:49.370+11:002010-01-22T11:13:49.370+11:00Yep. It's possible to see how in slightly diff...Yep. It's possible to see how in slightly different circumstances, say if a car had been following the bus and was only twenty feet behind, that this could have posed a risk to someone else, but what we saw on the clip was someone risking only his own neck. Nanny staters have a problem with that of course, but not being fans of property rights they forget that unless bus roofs are made to withstand the impact of idiot teens dropping on them from ten or more feet above someone has to pay the cost of it being fixed.Angry Exilehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02491082312193274360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3267928368747294421.post-88602736608227861492010-01-22T07:10:25.489+11:002010-01-22T07:10:25.489+11:00"but also members of the public"
How ma...<em>"but also members of the public"</em><br /><br />How many of them are sat on the roof? It's not fucking India.Dick Puddlecotehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01481866882188932892noreply@blogger.com